Teachers for Supply

When Michael Gove announced in December that he was scrapping national pay scales for teachers in favour of performance related pay, there has been a collective howl of shock from many staff rooms – and heads’ offices – around the country.

Under the system announced on Tuesday, teachers will now not progress automatically up nationally set pay ‘bands’. Instead, headteachers may have the choice to link an individual’s salary to their annual appraisal. Pay bands can be kept as a reference point, but as opposed to teachers steadily moving up points within a band, heads can have complete discretion over where within the band to put any member of staff.

Not everyone disagrees with the main, however it is difficult to locate a senior leader who thinks the measure will work in practice.

“We operate performance related pay anyway,” says Lawrence Montagu, headteacher on the ‘outstanding’ St Peter’s Highschool and Sixth Form College in Gloucester. “When people progress from the primary pay scale to the higher pay scale, they’re given targets. And in the event that they don’t hit them, they do not progress any longer.”

What concerns him, Montagu says, is the impression that teachers are only allowed to get on with what they do and no-one holds them accountable.

“These targets are meaningful,” he points out. “We’ve the potential for not progressing people to a higher point at the pay scale.”

“The one level at which performance must be relating to payment in any respect in that direct way must be capability,” says Tom Sherrington, headteacher at another ‘outstanding’ school, King Edward VI Grammar School in Chelmsford.

“In case you think a teacher seriously isn’t acting at a typical that’s appropriate, then fundamentally they should not be a teacher. We have already got that [capability] procedure, and heads should follow it. Beyond that, the thought of performance being involving your pay is totally toxic and a disaster.”

At Forest Gate Community School in Newham, headteacher Simon Elliott says there may be good research to indicate that during experimental trials or with well-controlled groups in educational settings within the USA, the impact of performance related pay have been as regards to zero. “i’m really not sure that almost all teachers are motivated primarily by money, nor do i do know in the event that they will do a higher job in the event that they are offered more,” he says. “The evidence would suggest not.”

His view is backed by professor Diane Ravitch, a historian of yankee education and author of The Death and Lifetime of the nice American School System: How Testing and selection Are Undermining Education. Politicians, she says, “believe they’ll recuperate results by offering bonuses to teachers. What they get instead is narrowing of the curriculum to what’s tested, score inflation, drilling to the test, and cheating. What they do not get is healthier education.”

Whether you support the main or not, however, there are practical difficulties in the best way to implement the measure with out more money currently available for salary uplifts.

Ros McMullen, principal on the David Young Academy in Leeds has no problem with the concept that of performance related pay and operates it to a point already. Teachers, she says, need recognition and she or he believes that pay offers a method of attaining that in addition to being a tight retention device for valued staff who might otherwise head off to higher paid pastures.

However, she says, “the presumption of this announcement is that some teachers are underperforming, because how else do you balance your books It feels a conundrum for those folks who’ve dealt effectively with under-performance. Am I speculated to introduce norm-referencing for teachers”

Montagu spells out in cold hard cash terms why he doesn’t believe he’s going to gain any longer flexibility from the measure.

“[George] Osborne announced a 1% increase in public sector pay. So we visit the pay review board and say ‘we’ve been given 1%, so are you able to fund it’ They are saying ‘no, you need to find it.’ But we’re already funding a three% cut in 6th form funding, a 1.5% cut on main school funding and now a 1% overall cut. So where are we going to locate the cash to do more PRP”

Geoff Barton, headteacher at King Edward VI School in Bury St Edmunds points out that there also are dangers of costly disagreements arising from one teacher being paid greater than another: this can mean schools incur significant legal costs in addition to having to pay compensation awards.

“The chance of it’s that heads are going to spend more time on decisions [about who gets paid more] and on challenges to [those] decisions,” he says.

Knowing how good your teachers also are comes all the way down to more nuanced judgements than an easy performance table, says Sherrington. “Data and lesson observations are just snapshots. The important thing factor is that every one teachers have a reputational standing in a college which is in line with everything you do, and that’s the reason far too subtle to measure with a metric.”

In many colleges, notes Elliott, performance management is executed by close colleagues. “This may result in loads of gaming of the system, and unvalidated evidence getting used . Performance related pay will mean major changes in how schools manage staff, and might undermine the collegiality of colleges.”

As well as being practically difficult to implement, performance related pay, Sherrington says, might be counterproductive. “It’s going to demotivate staff, because it’s against the thought of collective action. Schools are effectively giant teams, so even supposing i believe I’m a superior teacher, i am unable to get the consequences my children get without the contribution of everyone within the school.”

Relying on performance related pay to incentivise ever better results also risks causing a breakdown in staff and senior management relationships, he believes.

“You’re going to get teachers saying ‘prove to me that I’ve not performed’ after which you will need to provide you with data to prove it,” he says. “That’s a number of my time taken.”

Add to this concerns about equal opportunities legislation: Montagu outlines a scenario where “you progress someone up £3,000 for doing a reputable job, and another up £2,000, who thinks they’re doing an identical good job… you can face every type of commercial relations problems.”

Elliott says that tackling underperformance is an easier path to enhancing children’s experience of education. “The facility of heads to handle underperforming staff must be strengthened and enshrined, and the unions should get on board. i don’t believe performance related pay is how one can do that.”

“The govt seems to be going after the incorrect target,” says Elliott. “Taking away the least effective teachers and seeking to raise the standard of these entering the profession may have some effects but they’re more likely to be very small when put next to the huge “effect size” of coaching teachers in techniques like formative assessment and peer to look feedback. There’s a mass of study from Dylan Wiliam and John Hattie to support this, nonetheless it doesn’t seem to be fashionable in government circles. Despite the mass of educational evidence behind this, it doesn’t make good copy or play well within the shires.”

Barton says he “will look carefully at [performance related pay] with governors and make sure that we have very transparent processes”. He too, however, will be working with a system that he has no faith in.

“What we see in the best schools is that people work collaboratively with each other,” he says. “It’s not about vying with the teacher in the next classroom. It runs counter to a collaborative culture.”

Sherrington says he’s going to not operate the system of performance related pay as announced by the secretary of state, “and my school could benefit, and my results will show it”.

He is hoping that there’ll remain a notional national pay scale to which heads may decide to refer, and that teaching unions will interact to create a top quality mark it really is awarded to colleges who operate what he calls “fair pay” for employees. “i suspect with a view to be in our interests to support,” he says.

This content is dropped at you by Guardian Professional. To get articles direct on your inbox, and to access thousands of free resources, register to the Guardian Teacher Network here. Seeking your next role See our Guardian jobs for schools site for thousands of the newest teaching, leadership and support jobs

As Britain’s youth jobs crisis deepens, it is time for ministers handy local council leaders the tools they have to make a difference.

Britain’s youth unemployment crisis remains stark. Nearly 40% of folk out of labor are under the age of 25. That’s one of the vital highest rates within the western world. Inside the last jobs stats, youth unemployment rose again. Nationally nearly one in five kids is out of labor and this can be costing us a fortune. Over one billion pounds a year in dole bills. And the pricetag is not only short term. Acevo (the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations) estimates that today’s rate of teen unemployment will cost us £6.3bn each year in lost economic output.

But now it’s clear just who’s leading the fightback. All over the world Britain it’s local Labour councils leading the way in which in building bridges for youngsters, from school or unemployment, into real local jobs.

Last year, as youth unemployment hit the million mark, I asked the leaders of 10 councils where youth unemployment is highest to return together, to share ideas, and to reveal Labour nationally what works to get children into jobs. Prior to now year, despite horrendous budget settlements, those leaders have begun to revolutionise the style we get our youth jobs in Britain’s 21st-century economy.

Cities comparable to Sheffield are transforming the manner they identify adolescents vulnerable to graduating to a lifetime of unemployment, so that you can target special additional support. Bradford council is building “industrial centres of excellence”: small schools of 300 students aged 14-19 offering enterprise skills, paid work experience and business-led qualifications – all tailored to what is actually available within the local jobs market.

Manchester is widening access to apprenticeships with its “apprentice ambassadors”, and a brand new Ucas-style clearing house to compare students with apprenticeship offers well before they leave school, conditional on making the grades.

Wales, Glasgow and Birmingham are reinventing the highly successful future jobs fund to ensure that youth out of labor are given paid opportunities as a springboard into local careers. Newham has even created Workplace, a one-stop job brokerage that places 5,000 local residents into jobs annually.

Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield have created “apprenticeship agencies”, organising training and work opportunities for thousands of apprentices with their cities’ diverse business base of SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises). Sandwell council within the West Midlands is guaranteeing three months’ work experience for each 16- to 24-year-old to make sure the borough’s teenagers are job ready.

Today, we publish these ideas and plenty of more inside the first report of Labour’s youth jobs taskforce, setting down just what may be done with a bit can-do spirit.

But i am unable to hide what disappointed me as I travelled round Britain taking note of ideas that made a difference. The cruel reality is government programmes are failing. In actuality, fewer than 6,000 youth were helped into sustained jobs: that’s just 3.4% of youngsters at the Work Programme. The Youth Contract, launched with much fanfare by the deputy prime minister last year, is operating so well that the govt. has decided to maintain its results a secret.

Worse, I’ve heard loud and clear that the dept for Work and Pensions is now too often a handbrake on progress. Most council leaders I speak to have great things to mention about their local jobcentre team – but Stalin-esque ministers are stopping people at the frontline getting on with what works best. “They’re good people, attempting to do the precise thing,” said one. “but they’re trapped in some very bad systems.” “DWP was unwilling to interact locally,” said another. I heard the identical story wherever I went.

The smartest thing we are able to give our adolescents is an opportunity. Labour councils at the moment are showing day in and day trip, that where there is a will, there is a way. With councils blazing ahead, and the national Work Programme in chaos, it is time DWP ministers got behind local council leaders and took down the roadblocks to reform.

Good leadership in higher education hasn’t ever mattered greater than now, with increases in tuition fees, concerns over international recruitment, widening access pressures, to not forget the challenges of competing in a globalised research and teaching market. Can we really know enough about what makes an amazing leader inside the higher education sector

According to a up to date report commissioned by the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education and written by Jacky Lumby, professor on the University of Southampton, we do not, mainly because we’re taking a look at the role of leadership through a narrow lens. Will we need broader definitions of educational and administrative functions within a university

Many academics have come into higher education due to their “passion for his or her subject” in place of the concept of turning into a manager, says Newcastle’s leadership development manager Lynne Howlett, but they “can’t ignore” the significance of leadership succession.

As the management of universities grows ever more complex, what do we do to encourage those academics who do have leadership aspirations What’s more, how can the field help challenge the notional divide between academia and administration that always characterises debate and development on this area.

According to Abhinay Muthooa, head of the dep. of economics on the University of Warwick, “a school leader must be an instructional to realize the honor of the school she or he leads and to totally understand on the ground level the character of the university’s core intellectual functions.” Mutually, he adds, “a school leader should be an entrepreneur, ready to make the bold business decisions demanded and to grab the initiative where required.”

With higher education being redefined in lots of ways, it’s becoming increasingly important for universities to discover multi-faceted leaders to satisfy the various challenges of a changing sector.

What are the opportunities, challenges and structures for aspiring and emerging leaders in higher education Join us for our live chat on Friday 1 February from 12-2pm to talk about career progression, training, and the way we will develop the kind of leaders academia and the broader higher education sector needs.

You may also contribute on Twitter using the hashtag #HElivechat

Panel to be confirmed

This content is dropped at you by Guardian Professional. To get more articles like this direct on your inbox, join the upper Education Network.

Have you been getting warnings out of your university to scrub up your online profile Perhaps you have been ignoring them – but you’re secretly terrified your Facebook could ruin your career chances.

The truth is, it isn’t enough to obscure yourself online, anonymising your accounts within the hope that prospective employers won’t find you. Take the chance to offer yourself a favorable edge, and showcase your own brand.

Here is the definitive guide to all you must know to seem digitally competent:

Ensure you’re easily found

That avatar of Keith Lemon, a lager bottle, otherwise you wearing a micro bikini and pink cowboy hat while cage dancing in Faliraki isn’t doing all of your image within the workplace any favours. Select one distinctive headshot of yourself it truly is instantly recognisable and use it across all your accounts – from LinkedIn to Twitter to Facebook. Make sure you usually are not mistaken for somebody else and made to suffer for his or her bad behaviour.

Consider your employer as your primary audience, and do not pout or tinker with the pic much that your interviewer either won’t recognise you, or won’t approve of you. If a prospective employer searches for you, make certain they find you and prefer what they see.

Write a quick bio paragraph showcasing your interests and aptitudes, and use the identical one across all of your platforms.

Make a reputation for yourself

If you find someone available with an analogous name, consider further branding. Upload a backdrop in your Twitter, and use it as a Facebook banner, and a watermark in your blog and aboutme.com. It is going to highlight your qualities, interests and values – try how Team GB athletes have done this: here’s @TomDaley1994 creating a splash.

Start a blog, preferably WordPress (it has a better Google page ranking than Blogger or Tumblr), and open SlideShare and Flickr accounts and any others you could recall to mind. You will soon send your namesake falling down the pecking order on Google – all the way down to page 2, or better still 3.

I had one student with an awesome academic record who couldn’t even get an interview. Eventually, an agency bothered to provide him honest feedback. Matt discovered that while he did not have a Facebook profile, another student in his year with the identical name, but a really different lifestyle, did.

We created profiles for him on three popular platforms, identified his best qualities with the aid of a book called Strengths Finder, and created an authentic representation of Matt. Take control of your digital profile and mold it with care.

Clean up

Remove all bad language, meticulously correct poor spellings, and avoid textspeak – it gives a really bad impression.

If you discover anything potentially damaging about you on a Google search, attempt to get it removed by contacting whoever put it there or asking site moderators to take it down. Get directly to Google and ask them to take away that page from their search results.

Play down time-wasting

Delete all trace of the 60 hours every week you spend tending crops on Farmville, and take away casino-style games and apps – you do not want potential employers to get the impression you would waste their time gaming.

Photographic negatives

Clean up your photo albums – but don’t sanitise your pics to the purpose where you appear bland and characterless.

Showcase your fun side, your sporting achievements, your team leadership, your wide group of friends and social activities, your ability to address alcohol, your love of travel and music, even evidence of it slow inside the library revising. Remove the pictures of drinking games, though, and streaking inside the fountain at Trafalgar Square.

Untag yourself in unwise photographs; remove them completely in case you can. Do not be tempted to be indiscreet on apps like Snapchat (which allow you to set the time a photograph lasts). Screenshots and photos of phones mean anything may be permanent.

Consider carefully how photos of you sleeping world wide campus on Foursquare could look to a possible employer.

Groups and memberships

Audit Facebook like/fan pages and groups.

Misogynistic comments on pages naming and shaming people for doing the walk of shame after a large night within the student union bar says more about you than the man you’re defaming. Play nicely, and not talk negatively about anyone online – employers may fear you’ll vent about them.

Consider very carefully whether you should remain partial to pages where members admit sexual indiscretions or express bigoted views, even in jest.

What in the event you “like” then Savvy students like Facebook groups representing the brands they need to work for. They join groups on LinkedIn run by companies they need to note them. It’s an excellent strategy. Observe the discussions they host on their pages and contribute thoughtfully.

Network with staff you meet on work placements. Be seen to maneuver with those you aspire to hitch. In the event you offer an opinion in a qualified LinkedIn group, take note of your tone and do not locate as pompous. If someone rebuts your opinion, reply politely, and show yourself in a position to seeing several sides to an issue. You never know who could be reading.

You are known by the corporate you keep

Are you genuinely friends with 1,200 people Have you ever checked what they’re as much as lately In case your Facebook friends are pictured wearing electronic tags, doping up, or driving with cans of beer of their hands, your individual image can suffer.

Be guaranteed to balance status updates about your social life with mentions of time spent studying. Boasting about your new designer laptop or flying top notch can give employers the impression which you don’t really want the job up to the following candidate.

Never use social media if you’re angry, tired, drunk or under the influence of anything. Never react or respond to anyone who you’re feeling could be attempting to flame you or wind you up. When you are wrong, apologise promptly and in public.

Blog don’t bleat

You have a right to free speech. But when you blog about people you recognize, take into accout that an absence of discretion sends a message to employers.

Companies together with Apple are very particular about any mention in their brand or workplace by employees on social media – and can be uncomfortable with employing someone who diarises their every move online. Not just do companies desire to guard their brand, they sometimes ought to protect client confidentiality.

Employers may even see what you say about fellow students or lecturers as an illustration of what you can share about them or their clients.

That’s private

Of course you need to lock down your privacy settings. But I actually have recently heard of 2 UK employers asking candidates to log in to their Facebook during an interview.

Practice and rehearse the way you would negotiate with an interviewer who requests which you log in on your social media accounts at an interview – remaining polite and professional is really not that simple.

Be absolute to indicate that you’re very all in favour of the post, but explain that you are feeling the request is a breach of your privacy and in addition a legal breach of Facebook’s own terms and stipulations of service. You are able to gently indicate that some states inside the US (including Illinois and Maryland) have legislated in contrast practice and diplomatically attempt to move the interview on.

Obviously you can still ultimately be forced to house the request and face the results – but when you mostly consider everything you are saying on social media as public, and also you never share anything you would not feel free to your grandma to read, you are able to turn the location on your advantage.

It is academic reference season. Daily I receive requests from former and current students, or people whose work i’ve got read or examined, or met in a boost, to write in support in their application for further study or for tutorial jobs. I’m usually happy to do my bit. But as these references accumulate in files around the globe, I do wonder what percentage of them will ever be read.

Data protection has taken the thrill out of reference writing, and hence the joys out of reference reading. Gone are the times when it was possible to put in writing on a plain note card “Grab him while you can,” as apparently Gilbert Ryle, professor of philosophy at Oxford, did for one in every of his students within the 1960s. Or within the strangulated prose of Isaiah Berlin, in his recommendation for the intense legal philosopher HLA Hart, “What he’s tortured by is the idea that he’ll never be better than [AC] Ewing and may never hold other views than Ewing. He realises himself that this isn’t an extremely exciting frame of mind to be in … Nevertheless … he can’t be worse than Ewing, who, in the end, is … in his own way, not contemptible.”

These days one has to bear in mind that the man you’re writing for may eventually see the reference. Accordingly, reference inflation has set in, and everybody is just wonderful. One reference writer has said of several of his PhD students, “He jogs my memory of the young Wittgenstein.” (That’s right! He can never get his shirt to remain tucked in either!) Perhaps the oddest comment I’ve seen is “Pound for pound she is the right philosopher within the department.” What can that mean She’s not first-class, but however she is actually small

The US variety of academic reference writing needs a significant look. Typically, job candidates compile a “dossier” that comes with perhaps 5 or 6 references. And unless a reference is three or four single-spaced pages then the support is thought of as somewhat half-hearted. But usually there’s not that much to inform, and so we receive, in effect, six different versions of the candidate’s CV in prose form, combined with summaries of his or her PhD thesis, and some lines of detail designed to convince that the reference writer really knows the candidate well and have been truly, deeply, impressed.

But readers of references also are writers, and so we all know the guidelines. When reading job references our eyes glaze over until we reach the business paragraph: the single where the comparisons are made. The rule of thumb is that the more the reference writer stands proud his or her neck, the stronger the advice. In the event you say the candidate is ideal, meaning nothing. Should you say “within the top three of the cohort”, again, little or no. But when you assert the candidate is the ideal this year, or for several years, or for a decade, that suggests something. Certainly one of members of the comparison class could be reading, and be pointed out very sharp. The strongest reference of all says the individual is best than some starry named figure, albeit done in a slightly more positive way than Berlin’s comparison between Hart and Ewing.

For all of the effort and ink, what, as readers of references, can we hope to locate Only this: is the candidate better or worse than apparently from their CV Well, nobody goes to claim: beware, we must always never have admitted this person to our PhD programme and the thesis only passed since the supervisor kind of wrote it. So that’s half the explanation gone. And we probably won’t trust a referee who raves on and on. So the opposite half bites the dust, too. Hence the worth we get from academic references is minuscule in comparison to the hassle involved on both sides.

Perhaps it is time for academia to follow standard practice elsewhere on this planet of labor, seeking references only on the final stage. a brief form, with three questions. Can they be trusted to maintain their fingers out of the till Did they truly get such a lot of A stars at GCSE Are they neat and tidy The right answers, for sure, are yes, yes, no.

• Jonathan Wolff is professor of philosophy and dean of arts and arts, University College London